The 12 Best Cloud Migration Platforms in 2026
March 13, 2026
We assess your repositories against automation-specific compatibility thresholds
How It Works
1
Day 1-2: Scoping
A brief discovery call to understand your stack, team structure, and automation goals. You grant read-only repository access.
For large codebases, we jointly identify the highest-priority modules.
2
Week 1: Analysis
Automated tooling runs static analysis on code structure, dependencies, and test coverage while engineers review documentation quality, CI workflows, and context availability in parallel.
3
Week 2: Synthesis
Engineers consolidate findings into the scorecard, validate thresholds against your specific context, and build the prioritised remediation roadmap.
Every recommendation is pressure-tested by a second engineer for feasibility and sequencing.
4
Finish: Walkthrough
The 90-minute live walkthrough with your team. We deliver the scorecard, roadmap, and all supporting analysis. Your team leaves with a clear, actionable plan.
FAQ
What size of team or codebase is this designed for?
The audit is built for teams with meaningful production codebases - typically 10+ engineers with at least a year of accumulated code. Smaller teams or very new codebases usually don't have enough structural complexity to warrant a formal assessment, though we're happy to discuss your situation on a scoping call.
What access do you need to our code?
Read-only access to the repositories in scope. We never write to your codebase, never copy code off your infrastructure, and work within whatever security and compliance requirements you have. If you require a specific access method (VPN, air-gapped environment, on-site), we accommodate it.
How is this different from a code review?
A code review tells you what's wrong with specific code. This tells you what to fix across your codebase to make automation work. We're measuring compatibility with how automated generation tools read, interpret, and produce code.
What languages and frameworks do you support?
We support the major ecosystems: TypeScript/JavaScript, Python, Go, Java, Kotlin, Rust, C#, and Swift, across common frameworks (React, Next.js, Django, Spring, .NET, and others). If your stack includes something outside this list, raise it on the scoping call - we can confirm fit quickly.
Do we need to pause development during the audit?
No. The audit runs on read-only access against a snapshot of your current codebase. Your team continues shipping as normal. No branches locked, no merge freezes, no disruption.
Why not run this assessment internally?
Your senior engineers know the code - but they're optimising for human readability, not automation compatibility. These are different evaluation criteria. The five-dimension framework, the automation-specific thresholds, and the tooling that accelerates structural analysis across an entire codebase - that's what an external audit adds over a two-week internal effort.
What happens after we get the results?
You have a complete, actionable roadmap. Many teams take it and execute internally - the deliverables are designed to be self-contained. If you want Streamlogic to handle remediation engineering, we pick up exactly where the audit left off with full context already in place. Either path is a good outcome.
How is the audit priced?
It's a fixed-fee engagement, scoped during the discovery call based on codebase size and complexity. No hourly billing, no open-ended retainers. We'll give you a firm number before you commit to anything.
What Our Clients Say
Before Streamlogic stepped in, our media pipeline was already efficient. Now it's exceptional. Their team embedded a system that adapts, learns, and scales with our production flow. What used to take hours now takes minutes. What used to slip through cracks now comes out polished. We've seen a measurable lift in both output volume and content quality.
Andrew Krupski
Product Director, NT Technology (Lithuania)
As a design-led studio, our work lives in the details - textures, lighting, growth patterns. Before Streamlogic, visualizing complex botanical installations meant hours of manual prep and rendering. They built us an automation layer that feels almost magical: it pulls data from our planning tools and generates near-final visuals in a fraction of the time. We gained headspace. Now my team spends more time designing, less time chasing files. And for the level of quality they delivered, the investment was fair and smart.
Serge Prahodsky
CEO, April Studio (Poland)
In the legal field, precision, security, and responsiveness are the baseline. What impressed us most about the team at Streamlogic was their discipline, structure, and proactive style of work.
Dmitri Dubograev
CEO, Int'l Legal Counsels PC (USA)
Tech Council
Streamlogic in Munich: AI Infrastructure Summit Europe 2026
March 11, 2026
Streamlogic at London Lab Live 2026
March 5, 2026
Let's build the solution you need
Share what's slowing your team down. We'll take it from there.
Denis Avramenko
CTO, Co-Founder Streamlogic